Comments on: 4:3 to 16:9

By: What a Witch | borisseewald.de

What a Witch | borisseewald.de — Tue, 07 Jul 2009 22:07:48 +0000

[...] auch solange gedauert, weil beim Dreh unheimlich viele Fehler passiert sind, die schließlich im Schnitt ausgebadet werden mussten. Man lernt aber immer wieder: Von nun an nehme ich mir vor, ein [...]

By: Une

Une — Mon, 01 Dec 2008 00:46:35 +0000

No promises, but we would see into that at that time, should finance be available.

By: Boris Seewald

Boris Seewald — Sat, 29 Nov 2008 08:20:03 +0000

An ARC is indeed the best solution but it is also a question of the possibilities we have. No-Budget means mostly that we use the technical equipment we own personally.

But it would be great if a new project will be established afterwards out of this one. Depending on its distribution and success a project with better financial conditions can be made.
Hopefully with support of sponsorship and foundation.

What about cooperation with Pokadot Media responsible for the technical advice then

By: Une

Une — Sat, 29 Nov 2008 00:40:25 +0000

Simply run the rushes through and ‘ARC’ prior to edit to re-format to 16:9. then to Non-linear direct out to omit generation loss.
BBC standard!!

Shooting DV = big mistake, but we specialize in film grading and could grade for film like DOF and colour emulsions.

Liked the trailer, but the cut timings need looking at.
For low budget shorts I would of opted for a Panny HVX200 and a Letus 35 (Cheaper than a P&S mini 35, Pro 35 or the MovieTube – MovieTube, don’t want to go there!! Did a Promo for Playboy, and needed a hella-lotta lights 40k for the slow mo shot – mind you the DOF was a matter of millimeters with the lens we were on,
…The D’ asked for a 10m track in on the Chapman….I laughed!!

The Panny is good for dumping direct to hard drive live + you are on HD with over and under cranking options available!!